Work with me.
Four ways in, priced on the page — because you shouldn't need a sales call to learn what things cost, or for scoped work, what it starts at. A scoping conversation about an engagement is free. An hour of my judgment on your problem is the product, and it's priced like one.
DIRECT WITH THE PRINCIPAL · NO JUNIOR TEAM · CONFLICTS CLEARED BEFORE WE TALK · NDA ON REQUEST
The four engagements below are the productized ways in. Standing advisory retainers and expert-witness work — testimony, depositions, policy commentary — are scoped individually from the free call; the continuing build retainer lives under 04.
An hour of straight answers.
For founders, operators, counsel, and investors who want real answers about Claude-native operations — what it actually costs to run, what breaks, what's hype, and what to build first. Bring one concrete problem; leave with a position you can act on.
You get the recording and a one-page follow-up note: the decisions we discussed, my recommendation, and where to look next. Booked and paid up front — a short written intake first, so the hour starts at the problem, not the preamble.
- — Written intake before the call
- — Two slots per week, first come
- — Paid at scheduling
The plan before anyone writes code.
Two weeks against your actual workflows. I audit how the work moves today, then design the Claude-native architecture that fits it — the agents, the MCP tools, the data access, and the human gates that make it safe to run.
You leave with the architecture map, a governance starter kit drawn from the rails I run in production — change discipline, spend and publish gates, verification rules — and a sequenced 90-day build plan your team can execute. Or hand it back to me and I build the first loop.
- — Workflow + tooling audit
- — Architecture map: agents · tools · gates
- — Governance starter kit
- — Sequenced 90-day build plan
When your claims need a qualified outsider.
For AI and trust-infrastructure vendors whose systems face enterprise buyers, regulators, or courts. We define the evidentiary target together, then I examine the system against its own claims — integrity, independence, auditability — and deliver a written assessment of what your artifacts actually prove, with the gaps an opposing expert would find first.
Available as a one-off engagement or an annual re-assessment cycle. The assessment describes what the evidence establishes; the legal conclusions belong to your counsel.
- — Evidentiary target defined first
- — Examination against your own claims
- — Findings walk-through with your team
- — One-off or annual cycle
Built, gated, and running on your stack.
One closed loop in production — an agent, the MCP tools it needs, the human gates that keep it honest, and the measurement that proves it's working. Not a transformation program: a defined loop with a definition of done, accepted by walking it end to end. After the first loop proves out, a standing retainer continues the build cadence.
- — A real workflow is named, not "AI strategy" in the abstract
- — Data and tool access can actually be granted
- — A decision-maker is in the room
- — The pilot is paid — I don't do free ones
- — You own all artifacts and source
- — Acceptance = walking the live loop
Every engagement draws on systems I operate in production — daily.
An AI-operated house of consumer brands, a travel agency whose trips can be planned and booked through Claude and ChatGPT, and a Kentucky law practice with attorney judgment gated into an AI-native pipeline. When I price a build, I'm pricing work I've already done for myself.
UNIFY THEORY LLC IS A PROFESSIONAL-SERVICES FIRM, NOT A LAW FIRM. ASSESSMENTS AND ADVISORY WORK ARE NOT LEGAL ADVICE; LEGAL CONCLUSIONS BELONG TO YOUR COUNSEL. PRICES ARE FOR THE SCOPES DESCRIBED AND CONFIRMED IN A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF WORK BEFORE ANY ENGAGEMENT BEGINS.